http://fireflyeco.com/
rss
email
twitter
  • About

Recession Regression

2 comments
Posted on Mar 10 2010 by Daniel
Tweet

Blue Sky by fox_kiyo

Great news!  Carbon emissions in the US were down 3% in 2008, and are likely to trend even lower in 2009, according to a study published by the EPA.

Of course, it’s a little like congratulating a sick person on losing weight – positive effect, but a decidedly negative cause.

According to the LA Times,

“High gasoline prices, a slow economy and – ironically enough – a cool summer caused U.S. greenhouse gas emissions to fall nearly 3% in 2008 from 2007 levels, the Environmental Protection Agency reported today.

“It’s the largest year-over-year drop that the EPA has recorded since it began tracking greenhouse gas emissions in 1990.

“The 2009 decline will likely be even steeper: The federal Energy Information Administration reported this month that carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels, the major driver of American greenhouse gas emissions, fell more than 6% from 2008 to 2009.

“In many ways, the decline is intuitive. Gas prices soared in 2008. Americans drove less. Summer was cooler than in 2007, reducing air-conditioning demand and more than making up for increased heating costs that came from a cold winter. The economy slowed, reducing demand for electricity (read: coal) to power factories and businesses.

“Even when gas prices fell a bit last year, cash-strapped Americans stuck largely to their reduced driving habits. Meanwhile, the economy – and the demand for electricity – fell even more.”

As I work on UNC’s carbon inventory, I’m noticing a similar trend for 2009.  The University embarked on a very successful energy conservation program, burned more natural gas than in previous years, and received a greater proportion of its grid-purchased electricity from nuclear plants, a result of flagging electricity demand in the region.

I don’t have final numbers yet, but it looks like our 2009 carbon footprint will be smaller than the prior year, the first decrease since 2004.  Time will tell whether this is a healthy weight-loss, or the side effect of an ailing economy.

Can't get enough? Try these related posts:

  1. UNC Emissions Down 20%
  2. A Living Tree(map)
  3. Climate Action Plan Published
  4. The Unintended Consequence of Offsets
  5. Patent filed for Carbon Accounting

  Tags: carbon footprint, statistics, UNC Category: Carbon
  • Mike

    How did the university manage to ensure that its electrons came only from nuclear power? Have they figured a way to filter out the coal based electrons from the grid?

  • http://www.fireflyeco.com Daniel

    :) I wish.

    But seriously, in our talks with the utility company, they confirmed that the nuclear plants in the region are base-loaded, running at full capacity all the time because this is their cheapest power to produce.

    Next comes coal, with plants cycling up and down to meet daily demand. Peak times are met with natural gas, typically the most costly option.

    Since demand was so low, a greater proportion of the power was generated with nuclear plants, a carbon-free proposition.

Twitter

What you’re saying:

  • lu9 on Homestar. Sewiously.
  • Leslie Davis on BizBuzz: Plastic Bags into Oil
  • Anonymous on Free Money for Duke Energy Customers

Blogroll

  • FlowingData
    Weave for visualization development
    February 7, 2012

  • Green Building Advisor Blogs
    The Strange Geography of Thermostat Settings
    February 7, 2012

  • Chart Porn
    Beyond the Hairball
    February 6, 2012

  • JMP Blog
    New in JMP 10 for experiment design: Evaluate Design
    February 6, 2012

  • information aesthetics
    Super Chatter: Analyzing Conversations about the Super Bowl on Twitter
    February 6, 2012

  • mapawatt
    Build your own compost pile
    February 5, 2012

  • Visual Business Intelligence
    Should Data Visualizations Be Beautiful?
    February 1, 2012

  • Lean Insider
    The Denver Health & Hospital Authority -- The Results Are In
    January 25, 2012

  • Gemba Panta Rei
    Consumption Rate, Replenishment Time, SWIP and Why Glaciers Need Love
    January 23, 2012

  • Energy Circle
    ReCircle: The Rebound Effect, Smart Homes, Energy Monitoring, Spray Foam Insulation and more!
    January 13, 2012

Categories

  • Carbon
  • Commercial
  • Design
  • EcoMetrics
  • Energy
  • Financial
  • Food and Agriculture
  • InfoVis
  • Lean
  • Nature
  • PlotWatt
  • Policy
  • Pollution
  • Presentation
  • Residential
  • Solid Waste
  • Transportation
  • Water

Tags

agriculture appliances bacteria biomimicry buildings cap and trade carbon footprint cash for clunkers CFL climate change computers corn data efficiency electricity grid home comfort humidity humor HVAC LCA Lean LED legislation lighting maps marketing offsets oil organic recycling renewables SciLights smart grid social justice software solar statistics subsidies TEDTalks transportation UNC visualization waste Water

  • About
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License