http://fireflyeco.com/
rss
email
twitter
  • About

Visualizing a Campus Carbon Footprint

1 comment
Posted on May 30 2009 by Daniel
Tweet

How do you show the relative contribution of 300 buildings to a campus’s carbon footprint?  You might think pie chart, but then you’d have 300 slices and enough labels to make your head spin.  Why not try a Tree Map, instead?

A tree map represents each category as a box whose size corresponds to the measurement in question.  The boxes can be grouped and arranged into categories, so you can get a sense of how each item contributes to its class, and how each class adds up to the whole.

I made this tree map for the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s carbon inventory, and it shows the carbon footprint of every building on campus.  You can quickly see that laboratory buildings are by far the largest energy users.  Individual buildings, like Thurston-Bowles, have a larger carbon footprint than all the dining halls combined!  By examining the data in this way, you can begin to prioritize your energy efficiency strategies.  For example, you might choose to do a retro-commissioning project in a single lab, rather than doing projects in 10-15 residence halls with smaller gains per building.

Tree maps are not perfect, though, and you should keep their limitations in mind when you use them.  First, they rely on different areas to convey information, and unfortunately, the human visual system is not great at comparing areas.  This is further confused by the fact that all the boxes have different shapes.  A perfect square and an elongated rectangle may have the exact same area, but they look very different to the viewer.  So if you want to show relative proportions, rather than exact values, a tree map might work for you.

This particular tree map is practically famous, as it found its way into an article from Intelligent Enterprise.  Check it out, as well as, other examples of useful visualization techniques at their website.  Thanks to Arati at SAS for pointing out the article!

Can't get enough? Try these related posts:

  1. A Living Tree(map)
  2. Carbon Counters: Caveat Emptor
  3. EPA Counts Carbon
  4. Patent filed for Carbon Accounting
  5. 27 cubed

  Tags: carbon footprint, visualization Category: Carbon, InfoVis
  • Pingback: A Living Tree(map)

Twitter

What you’re saying:

  • Joeblow on Solar Sheep
  • lu9 on Homestar. Sewiously.
  • Leslie Davis on BizBuzz: Plastic Bags into Oil

Blogroll

  • Visual Business Intelligence
    Data Art vs. Data Visualization: Why Does a Distinction Matter?
    May 18, 2012

  • Chart Porn
    Compendium of Advanced Graphics Tools
    May 18, 2012

  • Energy Circle
    ReCircle: Financing Home Solar, Zero-VOC Paint, a Bathroom LED Upgrade, and more!
    May 18, 2012

  • FlowingData
    Is the filibuster unconstitutional?
    May 18, 2012

  • Green Building Advisor Blogs
    Choosing an Energy-Efficient Refrigerator
    May 18, 2012

  • JMP Blog
    10 tips for making analytics converts out of your colleagues
    May 17, 2012

  • Gemba Panta Rei
    Where is Your Suggestion Box?
    May 16, 2012

  • information aesthetics
    Venngage: And Yet Another Online Infographics Editor
    May 15, 2012

  • Lean Insider
    Problem Solving and the Lean Journey
    May 7, 2012

  • mapawatt
    If I wanted America to fail is a joke
    April 30, 2012

Categories

  • Carbon
  • Commercial
  • Design
  • EcoMetrics
  • Energy
  • Financial
  • Food and Agriculture
  • InfoVis
  • Lean
  • Nature
  • PlotWatt
  • Policy
  • Pollution
  • Presentation
  • Residential
  • Solid Waste
  • Transportation
  • Water

Tags

agriculture appliances bacteria biomimicry buildings cap and trade carbon footprint cash for clunkers CFL climate change computers corn data efficiency electricity grid home comfort humidity humor HVAC LCA Lean LED legislation lighting maps marketing offsets oil organic recycling renewables SciLights smart grid social justice software solar statistics subsidies TEDTalks transportation UNC visualization waste Water

  • About
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License